Religious trauma is real. It produces measurable harm β anxiety, distorted relationships with authority, shame responses disconnected from actual wrongdoing, hypervigilance around religious language and practice. The fact that it occurred in a Christian context does not make it less traumatic. In some ways it makes it more so, because it damages the categories through which healing would normally come.
What Scripture offers here is not a quick return to the system that harmed you. It offers a distinction that the system often deliberately blurred: between God and the institution claiming to represent him. Jesus made this distinction repeatedly and forcefully. In Matthew 15, when the Pharisees accuse his disciples of violating tradition, Jesus responds: "In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Tradition and doctrine built by humans and presented as divine command was something Jesus specifically identified and rejected. You are not rejecting God when you reject a system that added to his Word things he never said.
The freedom Paul describes in Galatians 5:1 β "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage" β was written to people who had been manipulated back into religious performance as a condition of acceptance. The yoke of bondage Paul names is not immorality. It is a religious system that put conditions on belonging that God never placed there. Paul treats this as worth an entire letter and some of his sharpest language.
Commentary is from a charismatic Protestant perspective, drawing on KJV text and public-domain sources including Spurgeon, Andrew Murray, and Matthew Henry.